Inactive delegate

đź’¤ 0%

Voted in 0/10 of the most recent proposals

ENS Avatar
0x4f...bf66
Voting power1.83M
Delegated addresses2311
Proposals created0
For/Against/Abstain
6443

Delegate Statement

Delegates have a primary job: direct Optimism’s capacity to support the ecosystem’s growth and health. As a founding core Velodrome team member and a long-term player in crypto, DeFi, and NFTs, I offer deep perspective in helping shape this direction. What’s good for Optimism is good for my protocol; what’s good for my protocol is good for Optimism. Velodrome can help to enact Optimism policy, and I intend to be one of hopefully many protocol liaisons to the Token House.

I see in Optimism an opportunity to play out my core belief that broadening stakeholder participation in a way that advantages growth is going to supplant legacy organizational models. Impact = Profit isn’t just about aligning incentives so that an entire community benefits from policy and private activity. It’s about reconsidering how we relate to one another, dropping zero-sum habits and aiming for growing overall bounties.

More generally, I want a front row seat with a genuine attempt to explore new forms of governance that can be applied well beyond the scope of DeFi, etc.

Becoming a delegate isn’t just about promoting core ideals, however: I’m also very competitive, and I want Optimism to win. Within Optimism we may aspire to be positive-sum, but in order to play this out completely, we need to demonstrate that we can also just work better than current alternatives in the market. So we need to win, and I want to help us get there.

My view on the Optimistic Vision

Reading through the other statements I’m struck by applicants’ enthusiasm about the possibilities of where correct digital democracy can take us: aligning stakeholders onchain and offchain; dodging the tragedy of the commons; provisioning and providing accessibility to underserved corners of societies; and so on.

I share this enthusiasm, and it’s what initially drove me to study and pursue alternative organizational models away from traditional corporate structures.

Less attended to, however, is, ironically, the defining phrase of the Collective:

a new model of digital democratic governance, optimized, to drive rapid and sustained growth of a decentralized ecosystem. It’s not enough to be satisfied with calling ourselves a new model — to me this statement is one of obligation. We need deliberate but rapid iteration – the optimization — which requires serious debate and decisive, data-driven action to make sure that this decentralized ecosystem will grow quickly and sustainably. Delegates need to be putting in the work here; weekly up/down votes are simply not enough.

To do this work correctly, we need greater participation from protocols — which are extensions of our democratic model — to ensure our ideals are getting translated into action. This means that protocols should contribute to governance while being accountable.

I’ve written elsewhere that many questions about DAO governance are fundamental organizational questions that have been grappled with over ages. We can build on previous knowledge in many cases, and I think that’s in part what I can offer here, having been an economist by training and profession.

To summarize, we’re all here because we agree we want the things outlined in the Vision. That’s the given, and it’s not enough for a delegate just to want this. Optimism’s core work – the thing that delegates need to be laser-focused on – is how to use administrative, social, and market levers to make Optimism as a going concern last long enough and thrive well enough to even have a shot at achieving these things.

My view on the first three articles of the Working Constitution

Virtually all of the responses to this segment say something like “This is great and I like this.” I do think this is great, and I do like this. But in the spirit of working beyond the commonly understood, I’ll add some additional thoughts.

This is a “Working Constitution” - That the constitution ought to be reconsidered does **not mean that community members and delegates can arbitrarily present standards as given without inviting serious pushback. The Constitution is still a foundational framework, and deviation or elaboration on this framework needs, at minimum, a paper trail. OP Citizens and OP Holders will equally coexist within the Collective - We’ve seen in history that bicameral governance structures allow a specialized minority Guardian class (here, Citizens) to hold disproportionate sway over broader policy. I think this frees up more space for the OP Holder class to allow for some more vote concentration, and ironically current fears about excessive concentration at the hands of protocols risk Optimism’s early direction being managed by a minority of incumbent Delegates. We shouldn’t be afraid of getting more OP tokens delegated. The Optimism Foundation will be a steward of the Optimism Collective and its early governance model - Until the Citizens take hold, it’s probably acceptable to lean more on the Foundation for their guidance (where they’re able to provide it), and as a Delegate I’d work to incorporate more of their expertise into my own thinking. I’m not sure to what extent Delegates have access to Foundation members, but they’ve been thinking about these topics for as long as anybody in this thread.

My skills and areas of expertise: economics, finance, organizational strategy, prediction markets

My favorite Web3 projects: Velodrome, Gitcoin, Maker DAO

Top Issues

Treasury management
Treasury management
I believe in the catalytic power of treasuries. Although there's certainly cause to ensure a sound runway, treasuries are made to be spent on productive uses, not hoarded. In a high-growth setting, the productive deployment of capacity should bring about massive economic multipliers. Finding the winning projects and initiatives capable of generating these multipliers is priority #1.

Past Votes

Voted for this proposal 7 days ago with 1.9M votes

Onchain Treasury Transfer Test

Reason: for science
Voted for this proposal about 2 months ago with 1.99M votes

Season 6: Standard Rollup Charter Ratification

Voted for this proposal about 2 months ago with 1.99M votes

Governor Update Proposal #3: Enable Onchain Treasury Execution

Voted for this proposal 3 months ago with 1.91M votes

Rolling Mission Requests

Voted on 8 options in this proposal 3 months ago with 1.91M votes

Rolling Mission Requests: Voting Cycle 27

Voted: Subsidized Audit Grants V2, Experimentation of Infrastructure Subsidies, Superchain Borrow/Lend Aggregator, Crosschain alert monitoring, Optimism Dominance in Yield-Bearing Assets - DEX Liquidity for YBAs, Decentralized Solvers and Aggregators on OP Mainnet / Superchain, Targeted extension of Superfest, Optimism Full Financial Audit
Voted on 1 options in this proposal 4 months ago with 1.86M votes

Security Council Elections: Cohort A Lead

alisha.eth
Voted for this proposal 4 months ago with 1.86M votes

Upgrade Proposal #10: Granite Network Upgrade

Voted on 6 options in this proposal 4 months ago with 1.86M votes

Security Council Elections Cohort A Members

Voted: Jepsen, ethernaut, ryscheng, nanexcool, Agora (as nominated by kent), Uniswap Foundation (as nominated by eek637)
Voted on 3 options in this proposal 4 months ago with 1.87M votes

Code of Conduct Council Elections

Voted: Oxytocin, fujiar, gospelofchange
Voted on 10 options in this proposal 5 months ago with 1.88M votes

Mission Requests: Intent #1, 500k OP

Voted: Request 1: Cross Chain Voting, Request 2: Research and Develop a framework to measure potential capture of the Token House, Request 3: Grants Claiming Tools , Request 4: Analysis of Grant Programs, Request 5: Voting Analysis, Request 6: Farcaster Social Graph, Request 7: Develop non-technical solutions for increasin -both voter and token participation in the DAO, Request 8: Decentralized alternative for contract attestation placeholder, Request 9: Create and Distribute Videos about Optimism Collective Governance, Request 10: Integration of Optimism Gov and RPGF into University Courses
Voted on 1 options in this proposal 5 months ago with 1.88M votes

Mission Requests: Intent #3B, 12M OP

Request 1: Support the Superchain
Voted on 22 options in this proposal 5 months ago with 1.88M votes

Mission Requests: Intent #3A, 6M OP

Voted: Request 1A: Optimism Dominance in Yield-Bearing Assets 1A, Request 1B: Optimism Dominance in Yield-Bearing Assets 1B, Request 1C: Optimism Dominance in Yield-Bearing Assets 1C, Request 1D: Optimism Dominance in Yield-Bearing Assets 1D, Request 2: Subsidized Audit Grants, Request 3: Developer Tools, Request 4: Research capital migration to the Superchain, Request 5: Microgrants for Experimental Projects, Request 6: Optimism as base for LRTs, Request 7: Experimental Derivative Markets , Request 8: ERC 4337 Data & Attribution Standards for the Superchain , Request 9: Sequencer commitment games, Request 10: Develop Onchain Social Games that attract Builders to Optimism - v2, Request 11: Open-source transaction simulator, Request 12: Increase Project Accounts, Request 13: Support on-chain games close to launch, Request 14:Optimism as Venture Studio, Request 15: Gaming Infra in the Superchain, Request 16: Marquee Governance Hackaton , Request 17 :Accelerating Game Development in the Superchain, Request 18: Decentralized Basis Trade, Request 19: Create Educational Programs that Empower Developers on Optimism - Modified with Lower Budget
Voted on 12 options in this proposal 6 months ago with 1.77M votes

Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Mission Reviewer

Voted: Derbygold.eth, katie, Jrocki, Michael, mastermojo, GFXlabs, MattL, jackanorak, MoneyManDoug, brichis, Tane, Antoine
Reason: voted people whose work has suggested a level of strategic vision and context that is necessary for this job imo people don't fully appreciate how important this role is. it's not just grants, it's doing BD, strategy setting, and being attentive enough to propose sometimes significant changes to a program that is best-in-class but still barely molded clay. there remains a gap between the professionalism a program of this scale demands and what we have (which, again, is still high) we need to be able to bring in the best of the best for this role, not choose between the people who are already here. part of that i suppose is bootstrapped prestige, which is why the GC has worked so hard up to this point. we have to earn this attention in an industry still marked by confusion and cynicism. i'm excited to try to push us toward the goal of building a governance system that is a model across industries, not just within our own
Voted on 3 options in this proposal 6 months ago with 1.77M votes

Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Audit Reviewer

Voted: m4rio.eth, AnthiasLabs, 0xDonPepe
Voted for this proposal 6 months ago with 1.77M votes

Upgrade Proposal #9: Fjord Network Upgrade

Voted for this proposal 6 months ago with 1.77M votes

Anticapture Commission Amendment

Voted for this proposal 6 months ago with 1.77M votes

Chain Delegation Program Amendment

Voted on 3 options in this proposal 6 months ago with 1.77M votes

Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Milestones and Metrics Reviewer

Voted: Juanbug_PGov, mmurthy, v3naru_Curia
Voted against this proposal 6 months ago with 1.77M votes

Season 6: V2. Code of Conduct Council Renewal

Reason: protest vote until we get some way to either indemnify the council or otherwise encourage them to do their job
Voted on 5 options in this proposal 6 months ago with 1.77M votes

Developer Advisory Board Elections

Voted: devtooligan, wildmolasses, wbnns, blockdev, noah.eth
Reason: many great candidates but we need more app layer devs on this board this had a lot of protocol level ppl and security researchers. ideally this board is like 80% dev sensibility and 20% business sensibility, where standard reviewers are the opposite
Loading...