Reason: We were initially inclined to support this as a way to improve governance, but Griff raised a thoughtful concern that shifted our perspective. We’ve decided not to support the proposal at this time.

Reason: This will help get everyone moving in the same direction.

Reason: We trust PGov’s judgment and continued contributions to the Collective.

Reason: In favor. We’ve seen the solid work Gonna.eth has contributed to OP over the years and believe these updates are a step in the right direction.

Reason: The Budget Board is a key step toward more decentralized, data-driven governance, shifting critical decisions from the Foundation to a transparent, community-led process.

Reason: We support the Isthmus hard fork as it ensures alignment with L1 and introduces important upgrades like withdrawals root, Operator Fee, and Prague features—improving the Superchain experience.

Reason: We support this proposal as a meaningful technical upgrade. These changes align with the future of modular and scalable rollup infrastructure.

Reason: We chose to vote for 4 organizations and 2 individuals whom we trust to fulfill the role effectively. We ensured not to overlap an organization with an individual.

Reason: We voted for Bunnic because we believe it's important to have someone in OPS. Since they are the only candidate, this vote does not represent a change in the decision.

Reason: We abstain due to a conflict of interest, we are working on some Optimism missions. We would appreciate opinions on abstaining. We will open a thread on the forum to discuss this in the upcoming weeks.

Reason: We abstain due to a conflict of interest, we are working on some Optimism missions. We would appreciate opinions on abstaining. We will open a thread on the forum to discuss this in the upcoming weeks.

Reason: We abstain due to a conflict of interest. We acknowledged the amazing work candidates in this election are doing. We would appreciate opinions on abstaining. We will open a thread on the forum to discuss this in the upcoming weeks.

Reason: We abstain due to a conflict of interest. However, having worked and collaborated with several of the candidates, we acknowledge the great work they are doing. We would appreciate opinions on abstaining. We will open a thread on the forum to discuss this in the upcoming weeks.

Reason: We abstain due to conflicts of interest with our own work. However, we recognized the great work candidates are doing. We would appreciate opinions on abstaining. We will open a thread on the forum to discuss this in the upcoming weeks.

Reason: We abstain. We recognize the great work being done by the top delegates but are abstaining due to a conflict of interest. We would appreciate opinions on abstaining. We will open a thread on the forum to discuss this in the upcoming weeks.