Reason: I can see no reason not to re-elect the existing lead

Reason: Continuity of existing members is important, plus there are a few candidates with great experience.

Reason: I'm voting for this proposal because the security council's workload was significantly larger than planned, and I think it's fair to compensate them for that. However, I don't want to set the precedent that every council can re-apply for more OP; this is an exceptional edge case.

Reason: Voting for all. As much as I'd like to vote for who gets the smaller budget reduction, it's so minimal that it isn't worth it.

Reason: I would like to express that I believe that the ACC should be changed into a different form, at a different time. The purpose is valuable, even if this particular form isn't at this time.

Reason: Voting For. In my opinion, this is a good way of doing a budget.

Reason: One step closer to superchain interoperability

Reason: I'm disappointed that this is the same intent as last season, but with reduced numbers. I'm disappointed interop didn't ship last season and the intent wasn't achieved. And I'm disappointed that the target is lower this season. But I'm voting for, because interop is still as important, or perhaps even more important now. I would like to see a little more constraint on how much $OP is spent, because the token is under pressure which becomes self-sustaining with high spending - and more attention paid to driving value to $OP to mitigate this (either through hard value accrual, or spreading the gospel of the superchain).

Reason: A good proposal with some improvements on last season.

Reason: One option, happy to approve it.

Reason: One option, happy to keep supporting Ed.

Reason: This is a simple improvement to prevent possible voting problems.

Reason: I think this is an improvement on the current selection process, so I'm voting for. However, I think there is further room for improvement in the execution of this - I'm not sure random selection is perfect, and I'd also like to see selection criteria expanded on, perhaps to exclude red flags, or to evaluate the quality of previous council service.

Reason: This is another step toward decentralisation, taking something previously done by the foundation and putting it in the hands of the collective.

Reason: Another day, another upgrade.

Reason: This will improve scalability, fault proofs, and fee pricing.