ENS Avatar
0x9e...d282
441.7 OP
Proposals Voted51 (68.92%)
For / Against / Abstain48 / 2 / 1
Recent activity7 of 10 last props
Proposals created0
Delegated from8 addresses

Delegate Statement

The top 10 delegates hold >51% of the voting power! Support small delegates by delegating to me! 😊

The top delegates are overweighted on people with a large following rather than people who are most capable and dedicated to the optimistic vision. Governance needs to be more decentralised, for the good of Optimism!

Why you should delegate to me:

  • I am highly qualified. I am a crypto native (since 2014), and am the founder of Brighton Blockchain, a local community meetup group, where I put on regular events and meet a huge diversity of people in the blockchain industry. It's one of the most active and successful groups in the UK outside of London. I have a wealth of knowledge and experience that I'm keen to put to good use!
  • I am highly engaged. I have a great voting record since I started participating, with explanations of each vote.
  • I am aligned with the optimistic vision. I even gave a talk on public goods funding in April 2022!
  • I am an independent voice in Optimism governance. It is vitally important that Optimism doesn't have a small minority controlling decisions, or suffer from groupthink.

My view on the first 3 articles of the working constitution:

  • I strongly support principle #1 in the working constitution (experimentation), as the lessons learned are more valuable than the cost of learning. (I also value learning from previous experiments - and not enough focus is on this!)
  • I support #2 in the working constitution - a bicameral system is taking what worked for old governance systems and using that is a reasonable starting point - but experimentation is welcome.
  • I also support #3 in the working constitution (backing the core optimism team). I believe in supporting teams with a strong track record. This goes for grants and governance proposals too - I will back good teams wherever possible!

In general, I favour action over inaction at this early stage in Optimism's life. Optimism is in competition with Arbitrum, Polygon, ZKSync, and others. This means rapid building and scaling is much more favourable than slow, bureaucratic processes - even after considering the trade-offs for both. Public goods funding is the most important job of Layer 2s, and Optimism has the most credible claim to prioritising it. Optimism must succeed. LFG!

Name: Milo Bowman

Address: milob.eth

Discord: MiloBowman

I have read and understood the Delegate Commitment Process.

I understand that becoming a delegate is a significant commitment.

My Web3 interests: Just about everything! DeFi, Economics, Events, Social Impact, Zero Knowledge.

Languages: English.

Links: My profile on curia, milobowman.com

Top Issues

Grant funding
Grant funding
Experiment, bias for action, back those with a good track record.
Public goods
Public goods
Public goods are good! Impact should equal profit!
AllowanceDelegated onFromTxn Hash
0.043 OP03/14/20240x43...4f3cView
422.12 OP11/16/20230x38...ff8cView
2.097 OP08/18/20230x1d...23baView
17.489 OP08/06/20230x9e...d282View

Past Votes

Voted on 4 options in this proposal 1 day ago with 439 votes

Rolling Mission Requests: Voting Cycle 27

Voted: Subsidized Audit Grants V2, Experimentation of Infrastructure Subsidies, Crosschain alert monitoring, Optimism Full Financial Audit
Reason: I think these requests have a good shot at meeting intent 3A at a reasonable budget. The others either don't seem to help intent 3A or seem wasteful; I'd like to see more data on similar projects (especially Superfest) in order to support them.
Voted for this proposal 4 days ago with 439 votes

Rolling Mission Requests

Reason: I think it is sensible to allow these funds to be used for other (new) mission requests, given the funds have already been approved.
Voted on 8 options in this proposal 22 days ago with 431 votes

Security Council Elections Cohort A Members

Voted: Jepsen, ethernaut, ryscheng, pablito.eth, nanexcool, Agora (as nominated by kent), emiliano, Uniswap Foundation (as nominated by eek637)
Reason: (Re-vote): There are many great candidates, but based on the town hall and the forum posts, I've chosen the candidates that I think are the most qualified, committed, aligned, and dependable.
Voted on 8 options in this proposal 25 days ago with 1.42K votes

Security Council Elections Cohort A Members

Voted: Jepsen, ethernaut, ryscheng, pablito.eth, nanexcool, Agora (as nominated by kent), emiliano, Uniswap Foundation (as nominated by eek637)
Reason: There are many great candidates, but based on the town hall and the forum posts, I've chosen the candidates that I think are the most qualified, committed, aligned, and dependable.
Voted on 1 options in this proposal 27 days ago with 1.42K votes

Security Council Elections: Cohort A Lead

alisha.eth
Reason: I can't see any reason why Alisha shouldn't be re-elected.
Voted for this proposal 27 days ago with 1.42K votes

Upgrade Proposal #10: Granite Network Upgrade

Reason: Necessary upgrade. Granite, you rock!
Voted on 6 options in this proposal about 1 month ago with 5.74K votes

Code of Conduct Council Elections

Voted: Bubli.eth, CryptoReuMD, Oxytocin, NazreAssad, fujiar, gospelofchange
Reason: I would be happy with any of these, all are qualified and would do well.
Voted on 5 options in this proposal 3 months ago with 4.97K votes

Developer Advisory Board Elections

Voted: devtooligan, wildmolasses, wbnns, anika, noah.eth
Reason: Strongly support wildmolasses after their DAB proposal. Devtooligan should be a good positive fit. Wbnns seems perfect at translating between technical and non-technical, so does Noah.eth who also has an impressive background. Finally I think Anika could offer a different perspective and add value to the DAB.
Voted on 3 options in this proposal 3 months ago with 4.97K votes

Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Audit Reviewer

Voted: m4rio.eth, AnthiasLabs, leo.sagan via seedlatam
Reason: M4rio has a wealth of experience in auditing, Anthiaslabs also has lots of valuable experience, and I think leo.sagan could do a good job too.
Voted on 13 options in this proposal 3 months ago with 4.97K votes

Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Mission Reviewer

Voted: katie, Jrocki, Michael, mastermojo, GFXlabs, MattL, jackanorak, MoneyManDoug, Sov, brichis, habacuc.eth via seedlatam, Tane, Antoine
Reason: The grants council needs a diversity of skills and expertise, as well as a mix of experience and fresh faces. Based on previous records, the town hall, and the applications, I believe these candidates would be best; 7 existing members, and 6 new ones that could offer something valuable (I couldn't narrow it down to just 12!)
Voted on 4 options in this proposal 3 months ago with 4.97K votes

Grants Council Reviewer Elections: Milestones and Metrics Reviewer

Voted: Juanbug_PGov, mmurthy, v3naru_Curia, LauNaMu
Reason: The previous reviewers were good and should be re-elected, and I think LauNaMu could add value too.
Voted for this proposal 3 months ago with 4.97K votes

Anticapture Commission Amendment

Reason: Standard minor update to the Anticapture Commission. As it's experimental, these amendments are to be expected.
Voted for this proposal 3 months ago with 4.97K votes

Chain Delegation Program Amendment

Reason: This makes sense, to bring more governance power to OP chains, in line with horizontal scaling of optimism.
Voted for this proposal 3 months ago with 4.97K votes

Season 6: V2. Code of Conduct Council Renewal

Reason: The budget is still a bit high, and I didn’t see any evidence from last season that warranted an expansion. But I do believe a council is necessary, and I’d prefer this to pass than to go without.
Voted for this proposal 3 months ago with 4.97K votes

Upgrade Proposal #9: Fjord Network Upgrade

Reason: This upgrade gives us a lot to look Fjord to!
Voted on 1 options in this proposal 4 months ago with 2.1K votes

Season 6: Developer Advisory Board Renewal

Zach Obront
Reason: I really love Ed Mazurek's proposal, there are a lot of sensible suggestions that should be taken seriously. Zach Obront has been a great DAB lead, and I hope he can consider these suggestions.
Voted for this proposal 4 months ago with 2.1K votes

Season 6: Intent Budgets

Reason: I support these budgets. Giving double the grant allocation to other chains in the superchain is a bold move, but I think it's the right direction to grow - this horizontal scaling is totally necessary.
Voted for this proposal 4 months ago with 2.1K votes

Season 6: Intents Ratification

Reason: These are really fantastic intents and they should be strongly supported. Focusing on bootstrapping developers is critical and I'm pleased to see such prioritisation. Growing the superchain too is one of the best ways to focus effort. On intent #1, I think it’s a small step, and important to keep moving forward, but I’d like to see a bit more clarity on the roadmap/timings to further decentralisation.
Voted for this proposal 4 months ago with 2.1K votes

Governor Update Proposal #2: Improvements to advanced delegation allowance calculations

Reason: More of a bug fix than a change.
Voted against this proposal 4 months ago with 2.1K votes

Season 6: Code of Conduct Council Renewal

Reason: This budget is way too high. The CoC council didn't have much work to do at all last season. You do not need 55k OP to enforce the Rules of Engagement.
Loading...