https://gov.optimism.io/t/final-code-of-conduct-council-cocc-operating-budget-for-season-6/8167/14
While I'm supportive of a council for code of conduct reviews, this budget request seems too high to me given the specific scope of work
https://gov.optimism.io/t/season-6-code-of-conduct-rescoping-2/8101/3
This council operated with a budget of 18,000 OP last season. The nature of its work means most of the time there are few tasks for the council to do - it only needs to be active when a complaint has been raised. Because of this, payment is mostly a retainer, and not intended to be compensation for large amounts of work.
they've already shown an unwillingness to do their jobs. figure out what it takes to incentivize them to actually see cases through before giving them a blanket budget.
See Gonna's explanation; I think it explains our reasoning the best.
Do not support extended budget at this point. Feel like we need to work together to come up with a better path to ensuring CoC works to align people across OP.
Voting "For", although again, I am wary of the budget growth in this council. It is easy to see this creep up season over season and the natural progression in governance is for more budget and process in these kinds of positions. That all said, Juan has done a great job and there is a great need for this kind of council to exist and this proposal has my support.
https://gov.optimism.io/t/brichis-delegate-communication-thread/6353/17
Our explanation here: https://gov.optimism.io/t/final-code-of-conduct-council-cocc-operating-budget-for-season-6/8167/9
We support the council but are doubtful of the drastic increase in budget. Because of this, we are voting against.
We agree with other delegates that the budget increase is too high given the rescoping of responsibilities. Supportive of the initiative overall and hope to see a revised budget presented in the next cycle.
Loading more votes...