Optimistic Proposal by The Optimism Foundation

Summary of Code of Conduct enforcement decisions

Proposal Visualization chevronIcon

The elected Token House Code of Conduct Council’s decisions are subject to optimistic approval by the Token House. That means the Council’s decisions are assumed to be approved unless 12% of the votable supply in the Token House votes to veto an enforcement action. You should only cast a vote if you want to override the decisions made by the Council. If this proposal is veto-d, the enforcement actions will go to a full Token House vote.

This proposal is eligible for Voting Cycle #17: https://gov.optimism.io/t/code-of-conduct-council-communication-thread/7453

Voting activity

This proposal is optimistically approved

This proposal will automatically pass unless 12% of the votable supply of OP is against. Currently 1.77% (2,046,808 OP) is against.

SUCCEEDED

Ended 7:45 pm Jan 24, 2024
Voters
Hasn't voted
  • 1,603,978
    I believe the CoC massively dropped the ball on two of these enforcement decisions and should further explain the rationale behind them. My fear is that they let the noise between antagonists cloud what were clear facts to be addressed, and they flinched.
    
    From the communications thread: "A member of our council said something important in relation to these first three decisions, '(The CoCC is) setting a precedent for what the CoCC is. How we can be fast with things that are clearly violations of the rules, and careful with breaches in the social fabric? How also instead of a punitive council, we are restoring optimism from its own contributors.'"
    
    This is silly. Of course the point of the CoC council is to be punitive when it's warranted. I'm not sure how restoring optimism enters into that part. Someone breaks the rules, do something about it, full stop.
  • I agree with Jack
  • good
Loading more votes...

If you agree with this proposal, you don’t need to vote. Only vote against if you oppose this proposal.