as a member of the grants council, we are abstaining from this vote.
as a member of the grants council, we are abstaining from this vote.
abstaining on this vote as a member of the grants council.
good use of funds.
the grants council has done an excellent job... i hope that we can use the grants council for everything and get stop having the delegates voting on every little proposal.
we support this proposal - as it is for builders who innovate and optimism needs more of that.
given the current state of intent 2, with more proposals received, we must avoid any possibility of "non-approval" due to lack of funds. relocating the unused funds from season 4 is a wise proposition. we also had the opportunity to have gonna at our seed latam governance call to understand better the situation and how the grants council is working these days. as a result, we express our vote in favor [for] of this proposal.
voting for the proposal.
check our gov profile for rationale
we support this grants council's proposal because it responsibly reallocates unspent op tokens from other intent to meet the growing demand and higher quality of intent 2 grant proposals. this proposal ensures optimal resource utilization, fosters key elements of the ecosystem such as 'experiments' and 'builders', and while also maintains solid transparency in governance practices.
a key element of of having a thriving and successful ecosystem is the need for constant innovation to push the boundaries of different types of applications that can be built on optimism. this proposal reflects this and daostewards approves!
let's build the op kingdom <3
Loading more votes...