The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @kaereste and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two. We are voting FOR the proposal. The amendments make sense and help define the role of the Anticapture Commission and the responsibilities of its members more clearly.
https://gov.optimism.io/t/season-6-anticapture-commission-amendment/8124/10?u=lefterisjp
This mostly clarifies and slightly reduces the scope of duties for the ACC. In particular, it is now clearly stated that the ACC is not required to vote on proposals that are not technical upgrades or subject to Citizen’s House veto, though it may still choose to do so if it prefers.
We're iteratingggggg
https://gov.optimism.io/t/brichis-delegate-communication-thread/6353/19
We voted in favor of the Amendment since the adjustments made are heading in the right direction.
The amendment and clarification make sense and we support continuity of ACC.
Simplifying the process is a good step forward, we need some structure to keep people engaged, but no reason to make work for the sake of work
beep boop
This will promote a better and more effective ACC commission.
Voted for: Amendments seem to be in line with the ACC retrospective.
The amendments look reasonable considering the scope of the commission
https://curialab.notion.site/Anticapture-Commission-Amendment-5eaf2e490c414ec9ba31d945310a685f
Voting FOR the proposal.
Hope to one day be members of this badass council
The frog concurs.
Voting "for" this proposal enhances the Anticapture Commission’s effectiveness by refining its mandate and criteria, ensuring good decentralized governance.
I vote in favor of this proposal due to the clear benefits it will bring to strengthen governance in Optimism. This proposal aims to enhance the effectiveness and transparency of the Anti-Capture Committee, a crucial structure to maintain decentralization and prevent undue capture of the Token House by stakeholder groups. Furthermore, these amendments will allow the Committee to better adapt to the changing needs of the Optimism ecosystem, maintaining its experimental role while improving its ability to significantly contribute to governance system resilience. In summary, voting for these amendments is essential to strengthen the transparency, fairness, and effectiveness of the Anti-Capture Committee in its protective role over the decision-making process in Optimism. I am convinced that these changes will positively contribute to the community by ensuring that governance remains robust and truly decentralized.
Yes yes yes
I vote for.
These amendments make the Anticapture Commission more efficient
In support of beneficial change
Important to be wary of centralization risks through exploitation of consensus majority
Such initiatives are necessary for the decentralization of governance.
ENS Sub domain power voter approved
We are for the refined objectives. The ACC continuation greatly benefits the collective.
Standard minor update to the Anticapture Commission. As it's experimental, these amendments are to be expected.
We are in the process of iteration and as many chains are being added to the superchain, this could grow and achieve the mission for which it was created.
great commitment
good for
These amendments make the Anticapture Commission more efficient
thanks for ur commitment
Important to be wary of centralization risks through exploitation of consensus majority
Loading more votes...