https://gov.optimism.io/t/developer-advisory-board/6892/12?u=kaereste
this is a small expense, and worth a trial period.
we support the proposed budget for the dab. given the importance of making precise technical decisions for optimism governance, it's crucial that the board members are fairly compensated for their expertise and commitment. the budget allocation seems reasonable considering the time frame. moreover, the establishment and proper functioning of the dab aligns with the collective's objectives.
good experiment. tokenhouse could use technical advice.
we are happy to see the foundation take more initiatives like these that promote diversity and encourage the collective to progressively begin to take ownership and self-regulation in the technical part of the protocol and contributions in that aspect; very in line also with the now presence of 3 core teams for the collective. the budget proposed as baseline is reasonable, considering the possibility of being rewarded retroactively. regarding the ratification of the members, in principle this is understood as a signal or reference point of how this board should be constituted and in the future we hope that the members can be elected. seed latam delegation team.
the developer advisory board could help with consulting the technical decisions, and the payment for the members looks reasonable.
voting for the proposal.
this initiative aligns well with our enduring commitment to advancing technical decentralization. the dab is poised to play a vital role in bridging the technical understanding gap within the governance entities, thus ensuring well-informed decisions around protocol upgrades and mission applications.
Loading more votes...