I've had reservations about this proposal: https://gov.optimism.io/t/security-council-vote-2-initial-member-ratification/7118/8 Since then, some of it has been addressed, but not ideally so I'm voting Abstain, and if the proposal passes (as is likely at this time) I'd like to see prompt action as promised in the responses. In future, I'd like to see involving the Token House and Citizen House for critical decisions like this, with progressively minimal unilateral decision making by OF. We've been doing this for 18 months now.
https://gov.optimism.io/t/security-council-vote-2-initial-member-ratification/7118/17?u=kaereste
We do not support voting on large bundles for important decisions, since it discourages due diligence on the part of delegates who will be overwhelmed or simply recognize that it would take a particularly egregious objection to derail the entire process. GFX does not oppose any of the individual members and is abstaining on the basis of process.
Security council members here seem experienced and credible.
Loading more votes...