we are not familiar with all of the board members, but we have confidence in the foundation's choices and look forward to working with them in the coming season. https://gov.optimism.io/t/developer-advisory-board/6892/12
we’re not familiar with all of these members, but those we are familiar with have technical backgrounds and/or are strongly aligned with important stakeholders.
while we may not be familiar with every individual on the list, we endorse the selection of developers based on the proven track record evident from their portfolio.
experienced developers.
we are happy to see the foundation take more initiatives like these that promote diversity and encourage the collective to progressively begin to take ownership and self-regulation in the technical part of the protocol and contributions in that aspect; very in line also with the now presence of 3 core teams for the collective. the budget proposed as baseline is reasonable, considering the possibility of being rewarded retroactively. regarding the ratification of the members, in principle this is understood as a signal or reference point of how this board should be constituted and in the future we hope that the members can be elected. seed latam delegation team.
board members have done an outstanding job so far.
confirmed the developer advisory board list. the background of the members looks promising.
great team! lfg
voting for the proposal.
after looking over the listed developer advisory board members, their backgrounds seem promising. even though we might not know every members personally, we support their selection based on the solid skills and achievements shown in their portfolios. approving these members is a positive step towards making sure the board has skilled and experienced individuals, ready to guide technical decisions to help the collective grow and innovate. additionally, we look forward to the possibility of electing board members in future seasons, which would further democratize the governance process within our collective.