OP’s governance concept is new, open and transparent enough. These are very attractive to me.

The governance of many projects on the market at present is not interesting and there is no sense of participation in the knot, and only a small number of people are willing to participate in the governance. So there is a need for agents to emerge.

Becoming an agent can deeply participate in the op ecology and can help the community more deeply.

My view on the Optimistic Vision: Many of the so-called public chains in the market are centralized. They are not only decentralized, they also abandon the original value of Eth network. op sticks to its claim (not abandoning the value of Eth, decentralization). I agree with OP’s proposition. op’s governance is novel and future-proof. op introduces and concept of meta-universe governance, which will make community governance more interesting and give community members a sense of participation.

My view on the first three articles of the Working Constitution:

Agree with the first point.

A governance model that can be used as an industry standard has not yet emerged. So we need a dynamic governance logic that can change with the tide. Strongly agree.

OP Citizens and OP Holders are mutually constrained to make governance dynamic and balanced, and OP Citizens makes governance more interesting and participatory.

strongly agree.

The existence of Optimism Foundation is an important player in the beginning of OP governance and can make OP more compliant. As time goes by, the decentralized governance logic will become more mature, and the Optimism Foundation’s authority will be decentralized at that time. That’s great.

My skills and areas of expertise: Marketing and Community Manager

My favorite Web3 projects: Element，Goldfich