Reason: Moving core admin roles on-chain is a critical and irreversible step. This "MVP" was approved by a single advisory board and is being pushed through an optimistic vote, which feels far too rushed for a change this sensitive.

Reason: The Uniswap Foundation brings a rare combination of deep technical expertise and profound ecosystem alignment. As a critical pillar of the Superchain, their vested interest in the network's security and stability is second to none, making them an exceptionally credible and responsible choice for the council.

Reason: We do believe alisha should lead the security council due to her deep experience

Reason: This veto is not about the maintenance itself, but the process. Removing a core, previously-approved feature based on opaque "partner feedback" creates uncertainty and sets a concerning precedent for governance. The community deserves a full, transparent explanation and a clearer roadmap before such a significant reversal is accepted.

Reason: Good governance systems adapt over time. The ACC was vital for the DAO's early stages, and dissolving it now is a sign of maturity and success, reflecting a sensible step to streamline the governance structure as the Collective evolves.

Reason: Continuing to focus on interoperability is a smart, disciplined strategy for the Collective. This specific and measurable goal of $100m in cross-chain transfers gives all builders and teams a clear, unified target to work towards, ensuring that efforts are aligned for maximum impact.

Reason: A strong Developer Advisory Board is crucial for grounding governance in technical reality. Ed's continued leadership and clear charter provide a vital link between the builders who create value on Optimism and the decisions that guide its future

Reason: An "Abstain" vote is an active choice that signals a delegate is present and attentive, but neutral. Removing this from quorum calculations treats engaged neutrality the same as absence, which weakens governance.

Reason: PGov has a strong track record of thoughtful contributions to the ecosystem. Their proposed charter for the Milestones and Metrics Council provides a clear framework for accountability, ensuring that grants and initiatives are measured against tangible outcomes, which is essential for the Collective's long-term health and success.

Reason: This vote affirms the community's trust in Gonna.eth's continued leadership of the Grants Council. Their well-defined charter for Season 8 provides a clear, responsible plan for allocating resources and driving ecosystem growth.

Reason: The random selection method, even with eligibility filters, may risk appointing underqualified members. A transparent election could better ensure accountability and competence in key grant oversight roles.

Reason: critical issues or coordination risks remain, delaying activation ensures network safety and stakeholder confidence.

Reason: Supporting this proposal as it establishes a foundational step toward decentralized financial governance. The appointed members bring strong experience, ensuring sound budgeting practices and strategic decision-making for the Collective’s long-term success.

Reason: The Isthmus hard fork brings critical improvements like L2 Withdrawals Root, Operator Fee, and Prague features—ensuring L2/L1 parity, better dev UX, and continued alignment across the Superchain.